|

For Immediate Release - January 11, 2011
•
Contact: Matthew Hess, President •
comments@mgmbill.org
Intactivists Push for State, Federal Bans on Infant
Circumcision
Proposed legislation from MGMbill.org would protect boys
from genital cutting the same way that girls are
protected.
SAN DIEGO, California –
Intactivists from across the country are once again
calling on state and federal lawmakers to prohibit
circumcision of boys. Regional directors from the
children’s rights group MGMbill.org submitted proposed
bills to more than 2,800 legislators yesterday, urging
them to extend the existing ban on forced female genital
cutting to include males.
Matthew Hess, the group’s
president, said circumcision is medically unnecessary
and robs men of their right to an intact body. “Boys are
born with a foreskin for a reason,” said Hess. “The
foreskin functions like an eyelid, providing protection
and keeping the penis moist and sensitive. It also
contains thousands of nerve endings and acts as a
natural lubricant during sexual activity. Boys deserve
to be legally protected from forced circumcision the
same way that girls are protected.”
Ron Low, director of
MGMbill.org’s Illinois state office, has invented
several devices to help circumcised men deal with their
loss while also pushing for legal action to protect
infant boys.
“The damage caused by
circumcision is very real,” said Low, who owns and
operates TLCTugger.com, a foreskin restoration device
manufacturer. “Fortunately, men can reverse some of that
damage by stretching their remaining shaft skin to
create a substitute foreskin. But the specialized nerve
endings removed from circumcision do not grow back, and
it’s a crime that so many men must go their entire lives
without ever experiencing sex the way nature intended.”
MGMbill.org’s Washington
state office director believes that circumcision is a
choice for each man to make on his own.
“I left my two sons intact
because I felt it was the right thing to do,” said
Jennifer Coulter, who lives near the westernmost part of
the Puget Sound. “But deciding whether to circumcise a
boy is a choice that no parent should ever have to make,
because male and female children deserve the same right
to genital integrity. We need to amend current laws that
protect girls from genital cutting so that boys are
protected, too. It’s only fair.”
Male circumcision has been
under intense legal scrutiny over the past year. In
March, the Massachusetts Joint Committee on the
Judiciary debated MGMbill.org’s genital integrity bill
for that state. The bill was defeated, but it marked the
first time in U.S. history that a legislative body held
a public hearing on a bill that would specifically
outlaw forced circumcision of males. Later that same
month, the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Canada
sentenced a father to a year in prison for circumcising
his four-year-old son at home for religious reasons.In
May, the Royal Dutch Medical Association issued a
statement declaring that male circumcision “conflicts
with the child’s right to autonomy and physical
integrity”, adding that there are “good reasons for a
legal prohibition of non-therapeutic circumcision of
male minors, as exists for female genital mutilation”.
2010 also saw the
publication of MGMbill.org’s new Foreskin Man comic book
series, which follows the adventures of a fictional
intactivist superhero. And in November, a group of
intactivists garnered national attention when they began
collecting signatures to put the San Francisco MGM Bill
on the November 2011 ballot. The measure would prohibit
circumcision of boys throughout the City and County of
San Francisco.
In the meantime, male
circumcision rates appear to be dropping fast as more
parents and doctors learn about the damaging effects. In
August, a study of more than 6.5 million boys conducted
by a Centers for Disease Control researcher found that
the U.S. infant circumcision rate had plummeted to 33%
percent in 2009 - down from 56% in 2006.
In addition to every
member of Congress, state legislators in Arkansas,
California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland,
Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Texas, and Washington all received the MGM
Bill proposal yesterday.
|