|

For Immediate Release - August 14, 2004
•
Contact:
Matthew Hess, President
•
comments@mgmbill.org
Activists
Condemn Circumcision of Almost 3-year Old Boy
SAN
DIEGO, California – Activists opposed to the practice of
male circumcision condemned a Kansas City father’s
decision to circumcise his almost 3-year old son before
the Missouri Supreme Court had a chance to rule on the
issue. The boy’s mother did not want her son circumcised
and had petitioned the court to intervene, but within
the last week an unidentified doctor went ahead and
performed the procedure under direction from the boy’s
father. The boy, Ethan Azar, turns 3 next month.
Matthew
Hess, President of San Diego based MGMbill.org, said
Ethan was discriminated against because of his gender.
“If Ethan
had been born a girl, Ray Jagoda (Ethan’s father) and
the doctor that circumcised him would be in prison right
now,” said Hess. “Both of these individuals should be
charged with assault.”
Van
Lewis, a Panacea, Florida, anti-circumcision activist,
made a similar comment. “Put the shoe on the other foot
for a moment,” he said. “Suppose it was a Muslim or
African tribal father who wanted to circumcise his
daughter over the objections of her mother who was
trying to save her child from female genital mutilation.
The father would be locked up under the jail and they'd
throw away the key.”
Although
all forms of female circumcision have been illegal in
the United States since the passage of the Female
Genital Mutilation (FGM) Prohibition Act in 1996,
circumcision of boys is still commonplace. The practice
is growing increasingly controversial as mounting
medical evidence shows that male circumcision causes
permanent damage to male sexual function.
“There
are thousands of highly specialized nerve endings in the
foreskin,” said Hess. “The foreskin has a very specific
function – to enhance male sexual pleasure. Ethan’s
right to make his own choice about his future sexual
health has been stolen from him.”
Camille
Azar, Ethan’s mother (from Lee's Summit, MO), agreed.
“The law is completely unfair, because this wouldn’t
have happened if Ethan was female. Despite the legal
filings I made to protect my son, Ethan was subjected to
male genital mutilation by force.”
A growing
number of people are calling on Congress to amend the
FGM Prohibition Act, claiming that it violates the equal
protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution. Earlier this year, MGMbill.org
submitted a bill proposal to Congress that would amend
the law to add protection for boys. It is currently
being evaluated by legislators and their staff.
|